Blog de César Salgado

Afganistán: pena de morte, secretismo e xuízos sen garantías

Amnistía Internacional denunciou nunha nota de prensa (9 - V - 2008) a falta de garantías nos xuízos e o secretismo sobre a aplicación da pena de morte en Afganistán. Neste país, o Tribunal Supremo confirmou en abril unhas cen sentencias á pena capital, pero non deu os nomes dos sentenciados. Témese que as execucións teñan lugar en secreto como no mes de outubro pasado.

A nota de prensa leva por título “Afghanistan: Death penalty”. Copio un extracto do seu contido:

The Supreme Court of Afghanistan has upheld around 100 death sentences issued by lower courts against individuals convicted of crimes including murder, rape, kidnapping and armed robbery. The sentences require the approval of President Karzai before executions can be carried out. Amnesty International fears that sudden and large-scale executions may take place in secrecy as happened in October 2007.

On 16 April 2008, the Supreme Court confirmed the death sentences but withheld the names of the accused and the locations where they are being detained. Credible information received by Amnesty International shows that the trial proceedings in at least some of the cases fell far below international standards of fairness. Flaws in the trial procedures included inadequate time for the accused to prepare for their defence, lack of legal representation during court proceedings, weak evidence presented before the courts and the denial of the defendants’ right to call and examine witnesses. [...]

Enlace relacionado:

Maio 12, 2008 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Amnesty International, Death penalty, Human Rights, Politics | | Non hai comentarios

AI report on Omar Khadr, child ‘enemy combatant’

Amnistía Internacional publicou a semana pasada un informe sobre Omar Khadr, un dos presos de Guantánamo que foi detido cando aínda era menor de idade. El, concretamente, tiña quince anos cando o detiveron en Afganistán…

O informe leva por título “USA: In whose best interests? Omar Khadr, child ‘enemy combatant’ facing military commission”. Copio un extracto do seu contido:

[...] What the government glosses over is the fact that Omar Khadr spent the final 26 months of his childhood in virtually incommunicado and highly coercive US military detention. His age today should not distract attention from his age at the time he was taken into custody nearly six years ago. To ignore this would give governments carte blanche to hold children in custody until they become adults in order to treat them as adults. That would drain international law of its protections.

The UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, the UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty, and other international standards require that detention pending trial shall be used only as a measure of last resort. All efforts should be found to find alternatives to detention, but if detention is used the highest priority must be given to “the most expeditious processing of such cases to ensure the shortest possible duration of detention”. While in custody, the child shall receive care, protection and all necessary individual assistance – social, educational, vocational, psychological, medical and physical – that they may require. At the same time, whether adult or child, the detainee shall be protected from any torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and the state is prohibited from taking advantage of the detainee’s situation to coerce information from him. [...]

Abril 21, 2008 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Amnesty International, Human Rights, Politics, United States | | Non hai comentarios

AI document: death sentences and executions in 2007

Amnistía Internacional publicou esta semana varios documentos sobre a pena de morte no mundo, entre eles un reconto por países das condenas impostas e das execucións. Debemos considerar que estas cifras son as feitas públicas por cada Goberno e soen ser inferiores ás reais.

Estes son os primeiros da lista en cifras absolutas:

  • China (470+)
  • Irán (317+)
  • Arabia Saudí (143+)
  • Pakistán (135+)
  • Estados Unidos (42)
  • Iraq (33+)
  • Vietnam (25+)
  • Iemen (15+)
  • Afganistán (15)

O documento está disponible en HTML ou PDF, con versións en inglés, español, árabe e francés en “Death sentences and executions in 2007″. Copio un extracto do seu contido:

During 2007, at least 1252 people were executed in 24 countries. At least 3347 people were sentenced to death in 51 countries. These were only minimum figures; the true figures were certainly higher.

Many countries carry out executions in secret and refuse to divulge any information on the use of the death penalty. Such countries include China, Singapore, Malaysia and Mongolia. The United Nations has repeatedly called for the death penalty only to be used in an open and transparent manner. [...]

As in previous years, the vast majority of executions worldwide were carried out in a small handful of countries. In 2007, 88 per cent of all known executions took place in five countries: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the USA. Saudi Arabia had the highest number of executions per capita, followed by Iran and Libya.

In 2007 the Chinese authorities again refused to publish statistics on the government’s use of the death penalty leaving the world in the dark about the number of executions carried out. Amnesty International believes there is likely to have been a significant drop in executions during 2007 after Supreme People’s Court (SPC) review for all death sentences was restored on 1 January. In 2007 470 executions were recorded by AI, but this number is based on public reports available and serves as an absolute minimum. The US-based organization “Dui Hua Foundation” estimates that 6,000 people were executed last year based on figures obtained from local officials. In a country as vast as China with tight government controls on information and the media only the authorities know the reality behind the use of the death penalty. [...]

Outro documento publicado esta semana por AI so ten versión en inglés: é “The death penalty worldwide developments in 2007″. Copio un extracto da súa introducción:

[...] In 2007 the world continued to move closer to the universal abolition of the capital punishment. Historical landmark towards the worldwide abolition of death penalty is the resolution on moratorium on executions endorsed by the United Nations 62nd General Assembly on 18 December 2007.

104 UN member states voted in favour of the ground-breaking resolution. 54 countries voted against, while 29 abstained. The resolution was supported by 87 governments from all regions of the world, as well as by NGOs including the World Coalition against the Death Penalty, the Community of Sant’Egidio, Hands Off Cain and Amnesty International.

More than two thirds of the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice. By the end of the 2007, 91 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes. During the year, three countries (Albania, Cook Islands and Rwanda) abolished the death penalty for all crimes and one country (Kyrgyzstan) abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes.

One state of the USA (New Jersey) joined the global trend towards ending the capital punishment. New Jersey was the first US state to abolish the capital punishment by law since the death penalty was reintroduced in the US in 1972. [...]

Abril 19, 2008 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Amnesty International, China, Death penalty, Human Rights, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Malaysia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Politics, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, United States, Vietnam, Yemen | | Non hai comentarios

AI report on the case of Khaled al-Maqtari, tortured and “disappeared” by the CIA

Amnistía Internacional publicou hoxe un informe dunhas 50 páxinas sobre o caso de Khaled al-Maqtari, detido por soldados dos Estados Unidos, torturado en Abu Ghraib e “desaparecido” pola CIA. Estivo en prisións secretas de Afganistán e quizá dalgún outro país.

O informe leva por título “United States of America: A case to answer. From Abu Ghraib to secret CIA custody: The case of Khaled al-Maqtari”. Copio un extracto da introducción:

On 6 September 2006, US President George W Bush announced the transfer of 14 men from secret Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) custody to military detention at the US Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. This was the first time that the US program of clandestine interrogation and detention, long an open secret, had been publicly acknowledged. Although the President noted that no-one was then being held by the CIA, he emphasized that the secret detention program would “continue to be crucial”. Indeed, the transfer of a 15th so-called “high value” detainee, ‘Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, from CIA custody to Guantánamo in April 2007 demonstrated the continuing operation of the CIA’s program. In June 2007, President Bush issued an executive order effectively re-authorizing the CIA’s use of secret detention and interrogation. That order remains in force.

In September 2007 CIA Director General Michael Hayden defended the program, including on the grounds that “fewer than 100 people” had been subjected to it.“These programs are targeted and selective,” he added. “They were designed for only the most dangerous terrorists and those believed to have the most valuable information, such as knowledge of planned attacks.” He and other US officials have used similar reasoning to defend the CIA’s use of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. In testimony to the US Senate Intelligence Committee on 5 February 2008, for example, General Hayden tried to justify the torture technique of “waterboarding”, simulated drowning, against three detainees in 2002 and 2003 as a means to obtain information from detainees at a time of perceived threat to public safety, and because the intelligence community “had limited knowledge about al-Qa’ida and its workings.” Such justifications fly in the face of the absolute prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment under international law.

The same goes for secret detention. No matter how carefully targeted the program is, the bottom line is that secret detention, in and of itself, violates international human rights and humanitarian law, as contained in treaties binding on the USA. Torture and enforced disappearance, which frequently accompany the use of secret incommunicado detention, are both crimes under international law. The illegality of the CIA’s secret program has been accompanied by a complete absence of accountability for such crimes.

The CIA has operated its secret detention program in covert prisons outside the USA, known as “black sites”. The locations of these sites are unknown, their operations are classified at the highest level of secrecy, they are not open to any scrutiny or inspection, the identity of those detained is not disclosed to family members, lawyers, or humanitarian organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), and detainees are isolated from each other and from the outside world. According to a November 2005 report in the Washington Post, there had been “black sites” in at least eight countries [...]

Khaled Abdu Ahmed Saleh al-Maqtari is one of those most recently released. He was held in CIA “black sites” in Afghanistan and in an unknown country until days before President Bush’s 6 September 2006 announcement, when the CIA network of secret jails appears to have been at least temporarily cleared. Khaled al-Maqtari has been held both at the notorious hard site at Abu Ghraib– where he has described a regime of beatings, sleep deprivation, suspension upside down in stressful positions, intimidation by dogs, induced hypothermia and other forms of torture – and in CIA “black sites” in Afghanistan and an unidentified third country, where he spent nearly three years in complete isolation, the victim of an enforced disappearance.

Marzo 14, 2008 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Amnesty International, Human Rights, Iraq, Politics, United States | | Non hai comentarios

HRW press release on Afghanistan: Overturn Death Sentence of Jailed Journalist

Human Rights Watch publicou antonte unha nota de prensa pedindo a anulación dunha condena a morte en Afganistán. O condenado é Parwiz Kambakhsh, un xornalista de 23 anos, e o seu delicto, calificado como “blasfemia”, foi imprimir e distribuír un documento onde mostra, mediante artigos do Corán, que o Islam recoñece os direitos das mulleres.

A nota de prensa leva por título “Afghanistan: Overturn Death Sentence of Jailed Journalist. Blasphemy Case Illustrates Failings of Legal System”. Copio e pego un extracto do seu contido:

A journalism student sentenced to death for “blasphemy” should immediately be released and his conviction and sentence set aside, Human Rights Watch said today. His arrest demonstrates the continuing power of the country’s notorious security services and radically conservative judges.

On January 22, a court in the northern Afghan province of Balkh sentenced 23-year-old Parwiz Kambakhsh to death for circulating an article about women’s rights in Islam he had downloaded from the internet. A panel of three judges ruled that the article constituted “blasphemy” and sentenced Kambakhsh to death in accordance with Sharia (Islamic) law. He denies that he is guilty of blasphemy and is appealing his conviction.

“Kambakhsh’s case demonstrates how fragile freedom of expression is in many parts of Afghanistan, and the lack of progress that has been made in establishing a professional judiciary,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “It is an embarrassment to the Karzai government, which has failed to take judicial reform seriously and allows a brutal and conservative security service to do whatever it wants.”

The Afghan security services arrested Kambakhsh on October 27, 2007, and held him for eight days before handing him over to the prosecution and judicial services. Since his arrest, Kambakhsh has been held in three different prisons over three months and denied access to a lawyer at all stages of the process. His brother, Yaqub Ibrahimi, told Human Rights Watch that while detained by the National Directorate of Security (NDS), Kambakhsh was beaten and threatened with execution until he signed a confession. In his court appearance on January 22, he faced the judges and a prosecutor alone. He was given his death sentence without a hearing.

The day after, the regional prosecutor, Hafizullah Khaliqyar, threatened to imprison all journalists who support Kambakhsh. [...]

Enlaces relacionados:

Febreiro 3, 2008 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, Politics, Religion | | Non hai comentarios

AI report: “Afghanistan. Detainees transferred to torture: ISAF complicity?”

Amnistía Internacional publicou hoxe un informe sobre a tortura e o maltrato a detidos en Afganistán, con énfase especial na responsabilidade da ISAF, e de diversos Estados, cando transfiren detidos ás autoridades afganas.

O informe leva por título “Afghanistan. Detainees transferred to torture: ISAF complicity?”. Copio e pego un extracto da introducción:

Detainees held in Afghanistan continue to face torture and other ill-treatment in the context of ongoing conflict involving the Afghan government, international military forces and armed groups such as the Taleban. Amnesty International (AI) is increasingly concerned about the fate of many detainees who face the risk of torture and other ill-treatment when they are transferred to Afghan authorities by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

AI is particularly concerned about the policy of ISAF states to hand over people to the National Directorate of Security (NDS), Afghanistan’s intelligence service. AI’s research and the work of others reveal a pattern of human rights violations, perpetrated with impunity by NDS personnel. Scores of NDS detainees, some arrested arbitrarily and detained incommunicado, that is without access to defence lawyers, families, courts or other outside bodies, have been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including being whipped, exposed to extreme cold and deprived of food.

AI has been particularly concerned about detention practices in Afghanistan since 2002, including detention by US forces operating under Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and the Afghan prison system in general. While this report focuses on the detention policy of ISAF states and specific Afghan authorities, AI has also raised concerns about failures by all parties to the conflict to meet their international obligations – including international military forces, the Afghan Government and armed groups such as the Taleban.

ISAF’s mandate to operate in Afghanistan stems from UN Security Council resolution 1386 of 20 December 2001. The resolution emphasises that ISAF should “assist the Afghan Interim Authority in the maintenance of security in Kabul and in surrounding areas.” As ISAF has expanded to cover the whole country, the importance of ISAF as a detainee transferring organization has increased and AI has been increasingly troubled by reports of detainees being subjected to torture and other ill-treatment by Afghan authorities.

Since early 2007 AI has been investigating the policies of NATO and ISAF states governing detainee transfers (primarily the use of agreements or Memorandums of Understanding) and has been documenting cases of torture and other ill-treatment. This report outlines the complexity of detainee transfers in Afghanistan and demonstrates areas of significant concern where AI believes that the international community has failed to meet its international obligations, particularly the principle of non-refoulement which is absolute and allows for no exceptions. [...]

Novembro 13, 2007 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Amnesty International, Human Rights, Politics | | Non hai comentarios

Afganistán: execución de 15 penas de morte

As autoridades de Afganistán executaron hai unha semana quince penas de morte, entre elas a de Reza Khan, condenado despois de “confesar” que participou no asasinato do xornalista español Julio Fuentes.

Non atenderon as peticións para que se conmutase a pena, transmitidas polo Goberno español no nome da familia do xornalista. Tampouco lles importará que, no día seguinte, a máxima responsable do Alto Comisionado das Nacións Unidas para os Direitos Humanos inste a restablecer de inmediato a moratoria sobre as execucións.

Tampouco aquí houbo un grande eco na prensa. Do que vin por aí, quedo coa columna de opinión escrita por Javier Ortiz, tamén publicada en papel no diario Público (12 - X - 2007):

La doble muerte de Fuentes

El Gobierno afgano asegura que un tal Reza Khan se declaró culpable del asesinato del periodista español Julio Fuentes. Resulta imposible saber a ciencia cierta si el tal Khan realmente se confesó autor del crimen y, en el caso de que lo hiciera, en qué condiciones lo hizo. Las técnicas de interrogatorio de la Policía afgana pudieron tener algo que ver en su confesión, si es que la hubo, y la desenvoltura con la que llevan a cabo su cometido los tribunales del presidente Hamid Karzai es fácil que contribuyera a aligerar los trámites del juicio del que salió condenado a muerte. A saber.

Lo que sí sabemos es que la Comisión Independiente de Derechos Humanos de Afganistán reclamó en 2004 una moratoria en la ejecución de las penas de muerte, alegando la inexistencia de garantías jurídicas que otorguen un mínimo de credibilidad a las sentencias. Hasta ahora, el presidente Karzai había atendido esa demanda, pero el lunes dio su visto bueno a la ejecución de una quincena de presos, Reza Khan entre ellos. Los mataron disparándoles a la cara. Compiten por el Guinness de la crueldad homicida con honores de Estado.

¿Quiso el presidente Karzai congraciarse con España pasando a Khan por las armas? Eligió un mal sistema. Abofeteó la memoria de Julio Fuentes, que siempre se opuso a la pena de muerte. Julio jamás habría aceptado esa ejecución, por muy asesino que fuera Khan.

Anteayer fue el Día Mundial contra la Pena de Muerte. Entre los estados que la practican de manera más recalcitrante, dos socios prioritarios de España: EEUU y China. ¿Algún reproche oficial? ¡Faltaría más! A cambio, tenemos un buen contingente militar en Afganistán para apuntalar el régimen del verdugo local. ¡Cosas del humanitarismo!

Outubro 13, 2007 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Death penalty, Human Rights, Politics | | Non hai comentarios

Afganistán: 200 civís mortos nun mes por ataques da ISAF

Afganistán: 200 civís mortos nun mes por ataques da ISAF (International Security Assistance Force). Debemos sentirnos atinxidos, porque hai uns seiscentos soldados españois participando nesa forza da OTAN.

A noticia publicada hoxe por Jason Burke no xornal británico The Guardian fala do último destes ataques: ‘Up to 80 civilians dead’ after US air strikes in Afghanistan. Extracto uns parágrafos:

Air strikes in the British-controlled Helmand province of Afghanistan may have killed civilians, coalition troops said yesterday as local people claimed that between 50 and 80 people, many of them women and children, had died.

In the latest of a series of attacks causing significant civilian casualties in recent weeks, more than 200 were killed by coalition troops in Afghanistan in June, far more than are believed to have been killed by Taliban militants. [...]

Senior British soldiers have previously expressed concerns that McNeill, who took command of the 32,000 NATO troops in Afghanistan only recently, was ‘a fan’ of the massive use of air power to defeat insurgents and that his favoured tactics could be counter-productive.

‘Every civilian dead means five new Taliban’, said one British officer who has recently returned from Helmand. [...]

Xullo 1, 2007 Posted by César Salgado | Afghanistan, Human Rights, Politics, Spain, United Kingdom, United States | | Non hai comentarios